Flashing Red Light

  • Books
  • About
  • Meet the Clients

Own Your Brand!

February 13, 2018 by David

Stop Hiding What Makes You Great

Is 2018 the year you step forward and present your authentic self to the world?

Do you want clients that are a better match? Customers that appreciate you? Vendors that “get” what is important to you?

Volunteer and non-profit opportunities that “click” with your values?

In my new book, Own Your Brand I explain how to use the popular LinkedIn service to present yourself and your abilities to a worldwide audience of 467 million people, following a proven step-by-step method.

The book guides you through a process that uncovers your abilities and capabilities, and helps you define yourself through specific techniques and numerous examples, just as dozens of my clients have done in the past several years.

You can buy it on Amazon (or get the Kindle version).

Barnes & Noble also has it. And 800-CEO-READ provides the book with volume discounts.

And my old friends at Powell’s Books in Portland, Oregon are stocking it too.


What They’re Saying About Own Your Brand:

I have found that David Billstrom’s wise counsel goes to the soul of meaningful living.  He is a gifted consigliere in the very best sense of providing strategic insight, tactical acumen and prescient context in the adventure of finding your authentic self.

David has the extraordinary ability to help executives and leaders learn powerful business and life lessons from others’ experience — as if we ourselves went through their journey.  In this book, he’s put the skills and insights down on paper, and we’re the winners.

– Reuven Carlyle Washington State Senator, Business Strategist


Learn more about my books on my website.

Filed Under: Coaching, Entrepreneurs, Marketing, Sometimes A Blog

Stop Trying to Get Married On The First Date (How to Recruit Talent)

January 19, 2018 by David

Almost by definition, every client I work with has plenty of experience finding employees, interviewing them, and hiring them.

A few might even have experience firing them, but not often (and that’s a topic for a different day). So they’ve got the minimum qualifications to recruit, right?

Um, well, not usually.

The “great” companies, whether they are publicly traded monoliths like Google, Intel, and Microsoft or tiny, svelt startups with halo venture capital backing, all share a common trait: the best talent wants to work there, and it is quite difficult to even get an interview at one of these companies, let alone a job. How did they get that way?

I counsel my clients recruiting talent to aim for this lofty goal: so many great candidates that you’re turning them away, picking and choosing among the talent pool to craft just the right mix of team members.

Very few entrepreneurial teams enjoy that kind of recruiting pool. But they can…

There are many components to creating a great team — company mission, leadership, awesome funding, great colleagues from the first day of company life, effective value system, and commercial success. There is nothing like the unmistakable smell of success. That brings in the stars.

But obviously a startup doesn’t have commercial success. And all will need to recruit before first revenue, let alone, profitability. But every other characteristic is achievable, even for a startup. How?

This is Sales

The first step is to confront in the reality of recruiting… is that this is just another form of sales.

And if you’ve been following along so far, you know that my definition of sales is “the effective influence of other people to do what you want, resulting in both you and them being quite happy with the outcome.”

We’re not trying to manipulate people here, and we’re certainly not seeking to get people to perform unnatural acts. But we are attempting to connect A with B, where both are happy.

And influencing people means work, and that means there needs to be a method.

More on the method in a moment — first, let’s also review another maxim: youhave to do it. The founders are best served if they themselves do the recruiting, and do it for months, if not years into the future.

Interview any successful founder, and they will recount their successes in terms of their team members. They’ll also recount that their biggest regrets are in the employees they either didn’t recruit (because they stepped away from the method) or they didn’t recruit effectively.

But Its Not Just For Founders

If you’re not the founder, there is still reason to develop recruiting skills.

The CEO that follows the founder; the second-in-command who helps lead the organization (e.g. COO, CFO, et al.) and even the department head (e.g. VP Engineering, Director of Marketing, et al.) will enjoy their job more, and experience a more successful career, if they are excellent in recruiting.

Companies are teams of people, and in most businesses and industries, the team is the key asset.

Heck, this is true in government agencies, academia, and in non-profits.

And I’ll go one step further, whether your growth has slowed, or you are doubling in size every year, you will be happier as a leader if you have a surplus of talent available in your pool of potential employees.

Always Be Recruiting

In other words, you should always be recruiting, even when you don’t currently have an opening. Whether or not you have an open position to fill today is a detail; the key is to have a talent pool.

Look around at the leaders in business and in non-profit organizations that you admire; notice that there are always talented staff that have worked with her before? They’re always recruiting.

The Method

There are just a five simple steps to my recruiting method:

#1 Write the job description. The usual classic way; I won’t belabor the point. But here is one difference: be sure to cover what you’ll accept as truly the absolute minimum qualification, so that it’s clear where the entry point is — don’t rely on a laundry list of desirable “nice to have” attributes.

At the same time, describe what you’d like “in the ideal candidate”, and don’t be afraid to dream big.

#2 Verify the job description with your team, and especially the leadership of the team. Listen carefully to their feedback, and be prepared to discuss this job in the context of other positions, both proposed and existing.

Often the discussion of the description surfaces previously latent questions about who does what; many organizations are evolving so quickly that the written descriptions haven’t kept up with reality. This is good, a sign of growth. But…

You don’t think you have enough time for this formality? Beware — in my experience the only other alternative is that the disagreement or misunderstanding about what the candidate will actually be doing… comes out during the interview process, in front of the candidate!

At best this is distracting, and at worst it can create fear, or even disgust from the candidate’s perspective. You want great candidates, they’ll sniff this out in a second. You’ve probably experienced this yourself.

In a fast-moving, high-growth organization, you might be surprised how often this happens. It is a real turn-off for the very best candidates, so get it right before they arrive.

#3 Write an advertisement, to attract candidates — and don’t publish that job description. Make it like the personals ads that ran in weekly newspapers in the 80s. While this art form has now largely atrophied, the point was to use the fewest amount of words to attract the maximum amount of candidates for a romantic date (papers charged by the word).

This generally goes better if you set aside the job description you honed in Step #2 and start with a blank piece of paper.

What is a personals ad? It has a hook or two to attract a potential date, and it describes just a bit of yourself — but the best ones keep this very brief. And above all, it contains an effective Call To Action. Less is more.

The business version of this is designed to get candidates. Not qualified employees, but candidates. Ideally your ad is so short, so relevant, so entertaining… members of your network are happy to forward it by email along to their network (more on that in a moment).

We all know the old maxim “no resume ever got a job” (only an interview). The same principle applies to job listings.

This is an ad — not a legal document that will be used 6 months from now to determine if the hired employee was successful. It is simply intended to get candidates.

Ditch the legalese… and the boilerplate.

In fact, if you detail in fine precision all the qualifications you want from the candidate, you will do a great job of attracting candidates who are obsessed with qualifications. Worse, they themselves are only impressed with companies that have lots of employees with lots of qualifications. Folks, that’s not startup material.

Let’s refine our goal: You don’t want to attract “qualified” candidates. You want to attract candidates that will perform beyond expectations and be a good fit with the team.

And publishing the job description? Way too much, too soon. It’s like handing out the answer key before the test. It’s like trying to find a spouse on the first date. Slow down, keep it light and lively.

#4 Use Your Network. Although I’m not biased against candidates that are unemployed and looking for a job (I’ve been there), in general you’d prefer candidates that aren’t really actively looking.

There are several reasons for this including: you can evaluate their recent performance, you see them in their native environment, and most importantly, you are unlikely to have to compete against other job offers, because they weren’t out collecting them.

If the candidate isn’t looking for you (because they’re employed), then you’ll have to look for them. This is easier than it sounds.

If you are a good leader, and your organization is doing interesting stuff, then I guarantee you that there are numerous people in your network who would love to have a small role in the movie called “my friend got this great job that was perfect for them.”

So after you have your ad in Step #3, then start sending it by email to selected individuals in your network.

Post it on Facebook. Put it in Linkedin.

Make it personal — so that it will be forwarded in a personal way. You want the 1:1 effect, not the broadcast method!

#5 You Do The Selection. Because your ad will be great at attracting interesting people, casting a wide net, you’ll have lots of culling to do.

This is a good thing.

You want to do the mapping of their experience to your needs — you don’t want them to do it for you, before you even get a chance to know they exist.

What I mean is that you are looking for a fit, and you know your organization best, and you know the specific challenges of the open position. An outsider and stranger would struggle to understand. So don’t let them rule you out, just because they don’t understand your team.

Cast a wide net, and look for fit, not credentials. If you get caught up in pattern-matching with traditional credentials you would miss a young Steve Jobs, young Bill Gates, and a host of other hardcore, top performers. Heck, you’d miss me.

For example, one of my clients was looking for a key employee in his new company, and understandably he listed “10 years experience as Director of Blah Blah required”. I immediately queried if he would take someone with 5 years experience if the 5 years was spent at the competing, premier company in Silicon Valley for that skill — and yes, of course he would.

Something as basic as years-of-experience is fungible. So why list it? You might miss a great candidate.

Putting It All Together

Here is a great example of a “personals ad” I saw a several years ago on an email list I was watching:

Date: Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:25 PM

Subject: [SeattleTech] [JOB] Technical Program Manager at {name}

To: Seattle Tech Startups <organize@seattletechstartups.com>

{name} is hiring a Technical Program Manager

If you’re interested or have questions… I’d be more than happy to answer. But here are the important things:

You’ll be working on a product that people are paying for. They pay for it, and are happy to pay for it.

You’ll be working with a solid product team. Kick-ass and fun. Also, we’ve got years of start-up experience under our belts.

Do you like Chinese food? we do.

You’ll be working for the same guy that mentored me in my first PM roles. He’s awesome, and you’ll be a better PM and probably a better person after working for him.

We have a ton of data, and perform mind-boggling complex analytics on them. Then, we have to transform that into something that is easily digestable and understandable.

Let me know if you’re interested.

—

Adam

Okay, let’s notice a few things in this fabulous email:

First, there are no qualifications or specifics. This is not a job description. They’re keeping their cards close about who they want, but did you even notice?

If you’re a candidate… you will see the vocabulary “Technical Program Manager” and “PM” and “complex analytics” and you’ll get it, if you’re qualified in the most general sense.

While I’ve protected their identity here with the { symbols }, in the actual email it would be trivial to go visit their site and get some basic due diligence.

I would consider leaving the identity of your company completely out, so that candidates can’t go visit your site and make a decision before making contact with you.

But alternatively, if you’re in a strong position, why not let it be known… make that due diligence possible by naming names.

Second, it is personal. He wrote it like he was talking to a buddy or maybe old college friend. So I am drawn in, but at the same time its appropriate. I could have met Adam at a conference last week.

I’m going to read this, unlike most of the job openings that show up on this list… yawn, I’m too busy. By being personal it is both accessible and differentiated from the boilerplate listings.

Third, it is specific about fit. The cultural fit will determine success in a way that academic degrees and work history rarely do. While he is not specific about job qualifications, he is specific about the culture and where their startup is in the growth path… to anyone with any kind of startup experience under their belt, he’s provided the credibility… up front… that they are “successful” with specific metrics (revenue, price points).

In other words, if I have the relevant experience… I’m probably attracted to this pragmatic, upfront, open discussion of key metrics. Bingo!

Fourth, it is a sell. “you’ll be a better PM and probably a better person after working for him” — wow. Now you couldn’t say this about every open position… or could you?

As we would say in marketing, this is an explicit benefit statement… rather than the feature listing (“experienced management team”, “learning opportunities”, “opportunity for growth”, blah blah blah).

He is making an explicit conclusion about what you would get out of this gig, connecting the dots.

Fifth, a call to action. Adam offers to take questions. Note that he’s not the hiring manager. He doesn’t say send your application in to HR. He says he’ll take questions.

I don’t know what Adam will do, but I do know when I’m in this position… the moment I answer that first question, I start asking my own questions (See the chapter on Sales as Discovery).

In other words, he’s keeping the bar low and available, and if the query isn’t from a suitable candidate, that unsuitable candidate may just know others who… are suitable.

What a priceless opportunity.

Why is this “ad” so effective? It is personal, relevant, casts a wide net, and has a hook.

This is what you want to aspire towards to collect meaningful candidates, and help build the reputation of your company. If you were a potential investor, this email alone might inspire you to take a closer look at this particular company. And current team members, investors, and stakeholders might even be inspired.

There is no downside to this approach in recruiting. It is quite literally win-win-win.

In my next piece, I’ll talk about interview methodology, the next step.

Filed Under: Coaching, Entrepreneurs, Leadership, Sometimes A Blog

Ambiguity… the Entrepreneur’s Friend

June 26, 2013 by David

“Ambiguity” — may be the largest force in the entrepreneur’s life and ecosystem.  Funding, customers, product development — all beyond the control of the entrepreneur.  The ability to handle ambiguity is a factor that I’ve encountered again and again in not only startups, but in real life, particularly the harsh environment of the emergency first responder.

Incomplete data, incomplete facts, partially completed product, inconclusive market data, partial context… limited time… what do you do?  Is this a threat?  An opportunity?  A distraction best ignored?

And as a leader, is this “business as usual” or does the environment shake you to your core? render you frozen with indecision… Is ambiguity  “comfortable” or at least familiar?

Is ambiguity your friend, or your foe?

In any uncertain situation whether business, or a traffic accident, I believe it is essential that the leader, or a leadership team, be comfortable with ambiguity.  So how do you spot this rare animal in a leader (or potential leader)?

Use the test here: http://jasonseiden.com/handling-ambiguity/ because his simple tests… resonate with my experience:

  • Comfort with unclear social settings
  • Intellectually curious
  • Strong and demonstrable “action orientation”
  • Good judgment

I couldn’t agree more.  Time and again I’ve found that leaders with those qualities/attributes… do fine with ambiguity.  And leaders not “comfortable” (an odd word, in this context) with ambiguity… they’ll drive themselves nutty, or at least their families.  Been there, done that.

Don’t have what it takes?  Don’t fret… it probably means your normal.  The ability to handle ambiguity, while “impressive” in the abstract, isn’t “normal” — in fact, these leaders can be hard to live with, hard to follow, hard to understand.  Don’t believe Hollywood’s projection of a leader… just because your leader is comfortable with ambiguity doesn’t mean they’re right.  Or easy to follow.  You may be a top performer in the leadership team precisely because you are not comfortable with ambiguity.

Most high performance teams need a combination of leaders comfortable with ambiguity, and members of the leadership team that insist on unambiguous decisions and stratetgy — wisdom and superior execution are a complicated combination of both perspectives.

Filed Under: Entrepreneurs, Leadership, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: coach, entrepreneur, founder, measurable objectives, shared values, startup

Ang Lee and the Uncertainty of Success

February 28, 2013 by David

“It’s common to hear “follow your bliss” or “do what you love and success follows.” Sounds great, right? Except here’s one small detail: You never get to know if it’s ever going to happen. You don’t get to choose if and in what form the success manifests; you don’t get to choose when it arrives.”

— Jeff Lin

In my newsletter last week I addressed the issue of startup founders with insufficient passion… you might want to read the thoughtful piece by Jeff, from which the quote above was pulled:

http://jeffjlin.com/2013/02/23/ang-lee-and-the-uncertainty-of-success

foto_no_exif-1

Jeff relates his view of the director Ang Lee, whom he interviewed before he was “successful” and operating at scale, and reveals vital information about Lee’s journey which you may not know.  And whether you are a lone wolf entrepreneur, or a leader fighting to break through, Jeff has some perspective you’ll want to ponder.

(He’s also a great writer, and the piece is thought-provoking even if you are not an entrepreneur)

Filed Under: Entrepreneurs, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: entrepreneur, goals, perseverance, startup

What Do You Really Want?

February 19, 2013 by David

As a venture capitalist, I met many engineers attempting to raise money for their startup tech company dream.  A pattern quickly emerged, which I hadn’t expected.  They couldn’t tell me why they wanted to start a company.

Often there was no passion as they struggled to explain Why.  And frankly, their explanation often sounded scripted.  Understandably, they were trying to tell me what they thought I wanted to hear – a common symptom when founders are trying to raise money.

As the pattern further developed, I eventually realized that they weren’t capitalists.  Almost none could tell me what their business model was for their company, let alone tell it with passion.  The simple reason: they weren’t passionate about the business.

This alone wasn’t reason enough to turn them down, but it was a huge red flag.  You won’t find many successful businesses, let alone high-risk speculative startups, without a passionate leader to take them through the very tough parts.  They have to really, really want it.

In fact, one prominent angel investor I work with told me years ago that he has never lost money when the founder was pursuing his or her passion – its not his only requirement for investing, but it is his most important one.

As it turned out, I found that many startup founders were primarily motivated by the desire to have independence.  Simply put, they wanted to control what they worked on, to choose who they worked with, and even the office space in which they worked.

And they didn’t realize it.

There are two problems with this.  First, they’re usually not going to get funded.  Passion for obsessive control is not a successful investment criteria for any investor (regardless of the homilies for Steve Jobs).

Second, if they somehow succeed in getting funded due to special circumstances (e.g. misrepresenting their motive of control; a frothy market for investment in the category; luck) they will be replaced as the leader by their investors at the first opportunity.

And this is truly unfortunate.  Reputations will suffer, months or even years of work will be sacrificed, and often teams will splinter irreparably, despite long-term relationships.  And the founder won’t get what they wanted in the first place!

This is just one example of misery due to not understanding what you Really Want. There are others…

You probably know a lawyer or two who are miserable in their chosen profession, despite having loved law school.

Engineers who discover they love teaching far more than working as an engineer.

And technical founders that never really wanted to run a business and revel in capitalism.

Often this can be avoided by a practice of mindful choices, along with a few tools.

Wants

Most of my clients are familiar with a simple, but demanding exercise I take them through.  I’ll summarize the key concepts for you here:

First, we need to distinguish between what we Want from what we Need.  Wants are aspirational, often thoughtful and informed.

For instance, if asked, most entrepreneurs will say that they Want “Integrity” in their life.  After all, who would say they don’t want to act with integrity?   Other examples include the Want for “Creating”, “To Be Appreciated” and “Financial Success”.

The exercise I use guides you through the thought experiment of trading off various Wants against each other, so that you can decide their relative importance in your future decisions.  A simplistic example would be “Choose one of Rich and Famous, but not both… which do you want?”

There is no right answer, and so the exercise is to determine your most important Wants. 

Of course, you could avoid the hard work, and make a list of 20 or even 30 aspirational goals, something like “To always act with integrity, while becoming rich and famous, and controlling every single thing and also being appreciated as a loving sensitive person who can relate to anyone… etc. etc.” but it wouldn’t be very practical.  Or realistic.

And the research shows that we can handle a limited number of goals and aspirations at any given time; I usually suggest no more than five.

Part of the exercise is designed to “get around” the intellectual, analytic part of our mind that tries to run most of the decision-making and goal-making in our lives… and get to latent Wants that have gone unnoticed because it’s not part of the intellectual, theoretical view of ourselves that we hold (or that we inherited from our parents).

Clients often uncover Wants that are deeply meaningful and touching, that didn’t make their first draft list of the most important.  This is when individuals sometimes realize (for instance) that they’ve always loved teaching; they’ve always loved tinkering; they’ve always loved creating products. 

Now we’re getting somewhere!

(And my investor colleagues would be interested in hearing about a startup that taps a founder’s life-long passion).

Needs

The second aspect of this topic is understanding your underlying Needs. Needs are the fundamental requirements that you can’t modify.

For example, one of my clients knows from long experience that she “needs” demanding cardio exercise at least every other day, if not 5-6 days a week.  Without enough of it, her physical self affects her mental self, and thus professional effectiveness, even her personal relationships.  She becomes edgy, even a little depressed.  If you aren’t like this, you probably know someone who is.  This isn’t a “Want” because it isn’t aspirational, and she can’t really “control” it in any simple way, it is an underlying drive.

A darker example of a Need would be an alcoholic that needs a drink, or really any addiction, including the addiction to always be working.

We will do almost anything for a Need – such as those previously described Founders who fib to their investors (and/or themselves) about their Need for control.

The relevance of the Need is that we want to understand it, without judgment.

Why?  Simply put, Needs that aren’t understood and identified, have a habit of sabotaging our work, our journey, and our relationships.  Regardless of whether it is a positive Need such as needing daily exercise, or a negative Need, such as controlling every small detail in product development, the first step is identifying it.

This part can be tough – our self-image, let alone our professional image or “brand” may not easily accommodate the insights about our Needs.

This process must be confidential, or the client will avoid the less flattering Needs or may not be able to admit to themselves what they really Want for fear of being seen impractical, greedy, or even unworthy.  This is one of the reasons why this can be very hard work.

But it is essential.  Even if there are no grand revelations, and the Wants and Needs documented through the exercise were known to the client all along, the clarity and written record creates a measuring stick that can be applied to future decisions.

I often encourage clients to review their final Wants/Needs inventory on a periodic basis, and when faced with a difficult decision.  They can remind themselves why they may be tilting in a particular way on the decision, and with this self-awareness, make a better decision consistent with their long-term goals.

And those unfundable technical founders I kept meeting in venture capital pitches?  They were mistaking their Need for control to be a Want for entrepreneurial work.

They will be far more successful if they find a role where their control requirements are a welcome attribute, or by partnering with an entrepreneurial leader who is passionate about capitalism.  And in the end, they’ll be far more happy, getting what they really Need.

 

Filed Under: Coaching, Entrepreneurs, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: business venture, entrepreneur, founder, goals, passion, shared values, startup

Better Cognitive Function for Entrepreneurs

December 15, 2012 by David

Entrepreneurs can gain better cognitive function, execute on multi-tasking challenges more effectively, and solve problems like Sherlock Holmes.

All by a daily or weekly mindfulness practice of as little as 15 minutes a day… it may even build a defense against Alzhiemers later in life.

Check out this timely article in the New York Times on meditation and mindfulness.

 

Filed Under: Entrepreneurs, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: entrepreneur, leadership, meditation, mindfulness, problem solving, thinking

Metrics… for Life

November 19, 2012 by David

My clients will recognize my constant encouragement to set measurable objectives, and then utilize consistent process to apply metrics consciously and mindfully… for business goals and career goals.

Now there’s a book that helps define the benefit of this philosophy for your personal life, particularly if you are a busy and forward-driving executive or entrepreneur.

Clayton Christensen of the Harvard Business School wrote How Will You Measure Your Life? after a series of life events propelled him to share his point of view (an amazing and moving story).

He writes that his first clue that there was a problem with ensuring a happy and successful personal life was when he attended an HBS reunion to discover that nearly every member of his class had been spectacularly unsuccessful (and generally unhappy) in their personal and family lives, despite many accomplishments in their professional lives.  Sound familiar?

I appreciated Christensen’s realization that his classmates were extraordinarily gifted, with both talent and opportunity, trained to cast sophisticated strategy into aggressive business plans, and execute accordingly.  It wasn’t that they had planned to be unsuccessful in their personal lives, it was simply that they had no plan for their personal lives… and perhaps predictably, the results weren’t what they had assumed.

This realization is at the core of mindful and thoughtful coaching.  Set measurable objectives, explicitly and thoughtfully, and then scrupulously measure progress against the objectives.

I can’t recommend this book highly enough for every entrepreneur and business person; get it and read it.

Filed Under: Entrepreneurs, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: clayton christensen, entrepreneur, goals, harvard business school, HBS, leadership, measurable objectives, metrics, objectives, work life balance

Crazy, or Just Inspired?

January 4, 2012 by David

I was recently schooled on the importance of the “First Follower” in entrepreneurial startups, and the class was fully resonant.  In fact, I’m fairly embarrassed that I hadn’t realized the First Follower’s role before now.  Because it is essential.

The key here is that there isn’t much difference between a crazed whackjob and a brave new leader, at least not at first glance, and sometimes not even with the benefit of another look.  Is that guy crazy, or just inspired?

Let’s face it, we’ve all known for a long time that the #1 attribute of a entrepreneur is self-denial.  After all, the entrepreneur is going to hear constantly that It cannot be done, can’t be funded, can’t be built (or built affordebly), can’t be brought to market, can’t be (easily) sold, etc. etc.  Even the well-intended supporters can’t seem to stop themselves from pointing out the difficulties… and the entrepreneur has to ignore this input, has to practice self-denial and forge on ahead anyway.

But therein is the paradox.  An entrepreneur that ignores hard facts, hard constraints, and good advice… does so at their peril.  So how to balance the confidence to go on, no matter what, with the wisdom to listen and observe?

As we wonder about the individual on the whackjob-to-brilliance continuum, there is a test that almost everyone else is unconsciously waiting for: the First Follower.

This brief, 6 minute TED talk by Derek Sivers (founder of CD Baby, and quite a whackjob himself) you’ll see a vivid explanation of the concept: http://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_how_to_start_a_movement.html

While we can lionize the courage of brave leaders, the most important test isn’t their idea (or themselves) but whether they can attract a First Follower.  As Sivers explains, the First Follower models for everyone else, what they should do.

Because the esteemed leader isn’t actually modeling the desired behavior.  He’s out in front, doing something crazy.  The First Follower is literally and figuratively the model of what the rest of us need to do, the catalyst from crazy idea to brilliance.

Obviously, that isn’t sufficient for success, but it is absolutely necessary.  And if you think about it, investors, journalists, candidate employees, and definitely customers are looking for it.

Think about it.

Filed Under: Entrepreneurs, Leadership, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: entrepreneur, founder, leadership, marketing, shared values, startup

Why Partner?

October 6, 2011 by David

Chapter 3

Why Partner?

(from my upcoming book)

 

Indeed, why ask a partner to join you in your business?

Many of my clients, and before them, many of the founders I counseled, have assumed that they need a partner.  Even those who had lost money, endured sleepless nights, or otherwise suffered in previous startups that involved a partner seemed to still think that they needed a partner, in order to be successful.

I certainly identify with the assumption, and I myself had a partner for more than a decade continuously, and enjoyed it immensely while benefiting from it in myriad ways.  But that’s rare.  What seems to be the rule, not the exception, is ugly divorces.  Yes, not only did my partner and I come to a graceful conclusion, we’re still dear friends and would trust each other with our very lives.  How do you get one of those?  Well, we’ll talk about that…

First, let’s delve into why so many founders assume they need partners, or at least co-founders.  Then we’ll examine what is behind those “needs”.  We’ll finish up with some specific, concrete tools you can use if you’re thinking about a partner.

The Usual Suspects

Most of the entrepreneurs I meet who are looking for a partner, or have just recruited one, have done so because

[To be continued]

 

Filed Under: Entrepreneurs, Excerpts from the Upcoming Book, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: business venture, clients, co-founder, entrepreneur, founder, partner, startup

Steve Jobs

October 5, 2011 by David

There will be much said in the coming days from technology industry people far more articulate than me, with valuable insights and first-hand experience, regarding the passing of “Steve”. I’ll be interested in what they have to say, as it will be better than me. And since I’ve been using the products since the Apple-II and the Lisa, I’ll be eager to read them. But for tonight:

Someone once mentioned to me that Seattle was the only place they’d ever been where prestigious (and rich) business leaders were casually referred to by their first names, by people who had never worked with them. “Steve”, “Bill”, and “Paul”.

I had to agree with their observation. And add this: “Larry” in the Valley will never be as recognizable as “Steve”, and that habit started before “Bill”. I know this, because I went to high school in the Valley, with Apple employee #17 (yes, he was in high school too at the time, and he would give me a ride from school to Apple, and I’d walk home from there).  I’ve been keenly aware of Woz and Steve since then.

I didn’t even like him, but I admired him. And followed him.

Andy Grove was and is a great leader, and I kneel at the feet of Gordon Moore whom I had the honor of “working with” (I’m exaggerating my role) more than once. But Steve, well, Steve I could relate to. He wasn’t like me, but I thought maybe I was like him.

Dropped out of Reed College, check. Cultivated geeks more capable than himself, check. Started a company working the Net 30 financing method, check. Embraced UNIX before most knew what it was, check. Curious about everything and anything, check.

After that, it gets pretty different. Billions of dollars different, but other things too, many of which offend me still, decisions he made and people he screwed. I hope, not what I would have done, given his resources. And of course, he has awesome design (and I have none).

But I can’t deny it. He was not just figuratively, but literally, an inspiration. Thank you.

Filed Under: Entrepreneurs, Leadership, Sometimes A Blog Tagged With: entrepreneur, founder, leadership, startup, steve jobs

New Book

Own Your Brand: An Executive Coach Helps You Refine Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn

Just released by Col du Granon Press, David’s first book is now available at bookstores worldwide.

About David

David has been advising entrepreneurs and leaders since 1998. He founded Flashing Red Light eleven years ago. More about David...

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Medium
  • Twitter

Talk to Me

Lets start the conversation.
  • Home
  • About
  • Clients
  • Testimony
  • Coaching
  • Read These
  • Tools
  • Content

© 2023 by Flashing Red Light, LLC. All Rights Reserved.